Much to their dismay the UN and other governments dismissed out of hand their research, ridiculed them and sent them packing with their tail between their legs; totally bewildered. By the way, I felt so sorry for those guys they were Norwegian and Swiss I think. They just could not believe a governing body that purports to exist for the benefit of all mankind would dismiss this out of hand. Cosmic rays are not of solar origin. Cosmic rays have long been suspected of influencing cloud formation, but their effect on climate stability has not been established. Current century-length variations do not have any simple and widely accepted explanation, nor is it even clear that we are in an anomalously warm period.
Cosmic rays may be the cause, as may increases in carbon dioxide. Regardless, it is not settled science. Umm, cosmic rays and solar rays are not the same thing.
Cosmic Rays too Wimpy to Influence Climate
Cosmic rays are high energy radiation and energy spewed out by things like pulsars, supernova, black holes and all the stars with various events from the ,,, stars in our galaxy and galactic core and also the few hundred billion other galaxies that we can see. Its not just sunlight. Our earths magnetic field protects us from our suns charged particles. But it takes the suns magnetic field to deflect these super energetic interstellar particles.
But to my limited understanding cosmic rays can very wildly in intensity. Is my understanding correct? It seems to me that years is much too short a time frame from which to draw any meaningful conclusions.
But what the hell do I know. Icon were, for a number of years, best known for a series of illustrated, witty but intelligent guides to subjects such as Freud, Postmodernism and Einstein. The company has, however, moved in the past decade into more orthodox trade publishing, producing many stand-alone successes.
We have been proud to gain a reputation amongst the trade in recent years for being a brave, aggressive, forward-thinking and original publisher with a knack for succeeding in many diverse areas. We have particular strengths in politics, popular philosophy and psychology, history, sport, humour and, especially, popular science.
Skip Navigation and go to main content Bestsellers Books. Print this page. Includes delivery to Finland Out of stock Notify me when available Submit. Used from other sellers Check for new and used marketplace copies. Fewer cosmic rays meant fewer clouds--and a warmer world. The theory, simply put here but explained in fascinating detail, emerges at a time of intense public and political concern about climate change.
Motivated only by their concern that science must be trustworthy, Svensmark and Calder invite their readers to put aside their preconceptions about manmade global warming and look afresh at the role of Nature in this hottest of world issues. Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. More Details Original Title.
Other Editions 4. Friend Reviews.
Download The Chilling Stars: A Cosmic View of Climate Change Read Online - video dailymotion
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about The Chilling Stars , please sign up. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
- Edge, Issue 283 (September 2015).
- Eggsecutive Orders (A White House Chef Mystery);
- Cosmic Breitbart Climate Blunder?
- Henrik Svensmark;
- Producing for TV and New Media. A Real-World Approach for Producers.
- It: How Churches and Leaders Can Get It and Keep It.
- Slashdot Top Deals.
Community Reviews. Showing Rating details.
- Introduction to Mobile Robot Control.
- The Cause of the Gleissberg Cycle: A Working Hypothesis.
- The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised As Freedom;
- Desmog 2015 Main Menu.
More filters. Sort order. Feb 08, Ross rated it liked it Recommended to Ross by: Dad. Shelves: environment , science-nature. A fascinating explanation of scientific research into an alternative hypothesis of contemporary climate change. Briefly, the theory is that 1 cloud nucleation is promoted by cosmic rays charged atoms ejected from exploding stars at relativistic speeds that hit the Earth's atmosphere; and 2 the volume of those particles that hit the Earth varies with the long-term path of the Sun through the Milky Way and with the strength of short-term variations in the Sun's magnetic field, which helps sh A fascinating explanation of scientific research into an alternative hypothesis of contemporary climate change.
Briefly, the theory is that 1 cloud nucleation is promoted by cosmic rays charged atoms ejected from exploding stars at relativistic speeds that hit the Earth's atmosphere; and 2 the volume of those particles that hit the Earth varies with the long-term path of the Sun through the Milky Way and with the strength of short-term variations in the Sun's magnetic field, which helps shield Earth from the particles. Apart from explaining this intriguing theory and the not-totally convincing evidence for it, the book also provides interesting insight into astronomy, climate history, and the role that clouds play in driving climate.
That said, the book is weak in explaining why the cosmic-ray warming theory is more correct than the greenhouse warming theory, or why they can't both be true. Seems to me the effects should be additive. And yes, it is concerning that climate-change deniers will latch onto this science as somehow justifying a do-nothing stance. There is no one more dangerous than a man who has read only one book. I'm looking at you, Sen. Apr 26, Beth Haynes rated it really liked it Shelves: global-warming.
Svenmark's book for laymen on his research into the role of solar flares and cosmic rays on cloud formationand ultimately on climate change. Important information for those interested in understanding the full scope of the scientific controversy over global warming. Apr 30, Peter rated it really liked it. Of the climate change books that I have come across, I feel most comfortable with this one.
I had no idea that Stradivarius violins were made during a significant climate period called the Maunder minimum. I wonder whether this may bring some clarity to environmental sustainability issues and associated topics? Feb 19, Michel Sizaire rated it really liked it. Interesting Book. Nov 17, Icon Books rated it it was amazing Shelves: popular-science.
But on the causes, despite what looks to the public mind like a consensus, there are dissenting voices. Based on Henrik Svensmarks research at the Danish National Space Center, this book outlines a brilliant and daring new theory that has already provoked fresh thinking on global warming. As prize-winning scie 'Before you make up your mind about climate change you are advised to read this controversial, compelling book' Nexus Scientists agree that the earth has become hotter over the last century.